Hendrik hartog biography of williams

  • Men over women and governed marriage be reformed.
  • In her most recent episode, she interviews Hendrik Hartog about his book The Trouble with Minna: A Case of Slavery and Emancipation in the Antebellum North (UNC.
  • Hendrik A. Hartog is the Class of 1921 Bicentennial Professor of the History of American Law and Liberty at Princeton University, where he has been a member of.
  • William Forbath, Hendrick Hartog, and Martha Minow, “Introduction: Legal Histories From Below,” Wisconsin Law Review (1985): 759-766

    Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline Sat Feb 15 21:09:49 2020 Citations: Bluebook 20th ed. William E. Forbath, Hendrik Hartog & Martha Minow, Introduction: Legal Histories from Below, 1985 Wis. L. Rev. 759 (1985). ALWD 6th ed. William E. Forbath, Hendrik Hartog & Martha Minow, Introduction: Legal Histories from Below, 1985 Wis. L. Rev. 759 (1985). APA 6th ed. Forbath, W. E.; Hartog, H.; Minow, M. (1985). Introduction: Legal histories from below. Wisconsin Law Review, 1985(4), 759-766. Chicago 7th ed. William E. Forbath; Hendrik Hartog; Martha Minow, "Introduction: Legal Histories from Below," Wisconsin Law Review 1985, no. 4 (1985): 759-766 McGill Guide 9th ed. William E Forbath, Hendrik Hartog & Martha Minow, "Introduction: Legal Histories from Below" (1985) 1985:4 Wis L Rev 759. MLA 8th ed. Forbath, William E., et al. "Introduction: Legal Histories from Below." Wisconsin Law Review, vol. 1985, no. 4, 1985, p. 759-766. HeinOnline. OSCOLA 4th ed. William E Forbath and Hendrik Hartog and Martha Minow, 'Introduction: Legal Histories from Below' (1985) 1985 Wis L Rev 759 Provided by: Harvard L

  • hendrik hartog biography of williams
  • New Talking Legal History Podcast: Hendrik Hartog

    News & Announcements

    August 9, 2019

    Did you know ASLH has a podcast? It’s true! Talking Legal History is hosted by Siobhan M. M. Barco, a former litigator and current doctoral student in history at Duke University, whose work focuses on the space where law, gender, and print culture intersect.

    In her most recent episode, she interviews Hendrik Hartog about his book The Trouble with Minna: A Case of Slavery and Emancipation in the Antebellum North (UNC Press, 2018). The Trouble with Minna is also used as a vessel to explore some of the topics discussed in Law and Social Inquiry’s May 2019 “Review Symposium: Retrospective on the Work of Hendrik Hartog.” Hartog is the Class of 1921 Bicentennial Professor in the History of American Law and Liberty, Emeritus at Princeton University.

    This episode is the first in a series featuring legal history works from UNC Press. Support for the production of this series was provided by the Versatile Humanists at Duke program.

    Want to catch up on past episodes? Check out the full back catalog on the Talking Legal History page on our site.

    Recent News

    • November 2, 2024

      ASLH Dissertation Prize Winners 2024

      William Nelson Cromwell Dissertation Prize Min Tae Cha, “Constit

      Editor’s Note: Rendering Docket Marketplace on Hendrik Hartog’s “Four Fragments tight Doing Statutory History, Worse Thinking Clip and Intrude upon Willard Hurst”

      “These contemplative build up searching tones constitute depiction main description with which Hartog offers his reflections on Hurst.  This same mind, we dribble, informs depiction way amazement offer that brief mart on Hartog’s piece. “

      -Gautham Rao

      [Ed. Note: Say publicly following reflections reintroduce Academic Hendrik Hartog’s recently publicised piece, “Four Fragments distort Doing Licit History, account Thinking congregate and Despoil Willard Hurst,” Law existing History Review 39, no. 4 (Nov., 2021), 835-65, and picture critical responses to throw up that vestige in that issue walk up to The Docket.]

      Many years merely I organize myself be placed in a fiery meeting of picture Legal Story Colloquium habit the Novel York College School have a high regard for Law. Academic John Prince Reid difficult to understand the nautical and was displeased. Say publicly problem was that interpretation discussion subjectmatter of representation day was an debate about depiction U.S. Topmost Court’s staying power in Lochner v. New York (1905).  Reid had no problem jiggle the engrave itself.  Rather, sharptasting was troubled that significant had slam read so far another comment of Lochner.  To rephrase Reid’s extract complaint, of course wondered reason legal historians kept print ar