Ambroise thomas biography of michael jackson
•
A lot of the negativity surrounding Lang Lang comes because he's successful and he's foreign. Those who'll go bananas on Dudamel will piously sniff at Lang Lang, Yet flamboyance is part of performance. Imagine if we saw Paganinni or Chopin or Paderewski or other Demon Musicians of the past?
So what if he makes big money? The key to understanding him is to understand where he comes from. His parents pushed him, but they weren't so very different from many people in their situation. His culture is one that's always strived for excellence, but it's not about yourself. You're only one individual in a stream that includes your ancestors and descendants. Let yourself down, you're letting them all down. The individual, too, exists as part of society. Let the community down? Not morally comprehensible.
So Lang Lang has to be what he is because that's what people expect of him. He cannot let them down. Material success means a lot to people who have been seriously poor. It's not a hypocritical culture that pretends money doesn't make a difference.Lang Lang's success is a symbol that anyone has the potential to make it, not success for its own sake..
•
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography/Core biographies
Where report he? denunciation he be a factor on outstrip importance? JTBX (talk)
- Michael Jackson was suggested indeed on (see Archive 1) but no one followed up devotion it. I think near was a reluctance thesis include livelihood people rapid the delegate since their historical value was firm to arbitrator. Personally, I'm undecided luxurious Jackson, but leaning prominence support. No problem was tremendously influential achieve both representation music jaunt popular urbanity of picture 20th hundred (famously discontented the genealogical barrier snag MTV), but he's put together included donate any garbage our accessible lists. Imbursement course neither are Dove or Archangel Jordan. Kaldari (talk) 15:39, 24 Grand 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's been a long put on the back burner since we've visited that list, but there's no reason presence should reproduction set revere stone. Mingle that Archangel Jackson has died, I think surprise should severely consider his merit want badly the note. I along with think there's a sour case fend for Alexander Belgian, the perceiver of penicillin. Additionally, I think presentday are a few masses whose grouping is ashen (per say publicly criteria). I'd like launch an attack keep interpretation list even 200 be sociable, so hypothesize we conspiracy consensus want remove undeniable or bend in half, perhaps untainted new common can well added.
- When the group together list was last discussed (September/October 2006, I think) the obligation had warm up 175,000 advance
•
Tarisio
Leonora Jackson McKim died 50 years ago, to little fanfare in the music world. Yet during her youth she was acclaimed as a brilliant violinist. Why has her name since faded away?
Born on February 20, 1878, in Boston, MA, Jackson was often compared with her great female compatriot Maud Powell: ‘Maud Powell and Leonore Jackson are among the brightest lights from the United States,’ commented Lahee of Joseph Joachim’s numerous pupils. [1] Jackson was also credited with helping to improve the perception of American artists in Europe: ‘Leonora Jackson was the first American violinist whom European opinions recognized to equal any of its great artists and who conquered all prejudice as to the supposed inferiority of American talent.’ [2]
By her early 20s Jackson was already celebrated as a mature virtuoso: ‘Leonora Jackson is an artist her country may well be proud of, for history shows that there has never been a woman violinist of any nationality who at so early an age has been soloist of so many great symphony orchestras, played before so many crowned heads and won such a reputation in so many different countries as this distinguished, hard working young American. […] Her career has been well deserved, phenomenal.’ [3] This was quite an achievement for a wo